📺 Watch the full breakdown on the Deal or Dispute channel (video embed added once the episode is live).
Business partnership disputes rarely start with a screaming match. They start with a missing login. One owner can see the bank account; the other can’t. By the time a 50/50 partner is asking a court just to see the books, the money is usually the symptom, not the disease. A recent Missouri lawsuit involving a co-founder of the fast-growing 7 Brew coffee brand shows exactly how fast a “we trust each other” handshake can turn into a seven-figure courtroom fight.
This is general legal education for business owners, not legal advice. But the lesson is universal: the clauses you sign on day one decide whether a future disagreement is a quick conversation or a $2 million lawsuit. Below, we break down what allegedly happened, why courts move so fast on records, and the five clauses every co-owned company should have in writing.
What You’ll Learn
The Deal: How a Coffee Empire Spawned a Second Company
Ron Crume is credited as a co-founder of 7 Brew, the drive-thru coffee chain that began as a single stand in Rogers, Arkansas in 2017 and grew into one of the fastest-expanding coffee concepts in the country, ultimately drawing a growth investment from Blackstone. With hundreds of locations rolling out, somebody had to actually build the signature modular stands.
So in March 2021, Crume helped form a separate company in Springfield, Missouri: Creative Modular Construction (CMC). The lawsuit describes CMC as the modular builder behind 7 Brew’s rapid expansion. He didn’t go it alone. He brought in a partner, Lee Loveall, and they split the company 50/50, with Crume holding his half through a holding company he owns with his wife, Lisa, called Club 37.
This is how most partnerships in America begin: two capable people, a big opportunity, and enough trust that the paperwork feels like a formality. As we’ll see, the paperwork is never a formality.
The Dispute: $2 Million and a Locked Ledger
In February 2026, Club 37 sued Lee Loveall and his wife, Leanna, in the Circuit Court of Greene County, Missouri. The complaint alleges Loveall diverted more than $2 million of company money to personal use — naming family vacations to Hawaii and a truck for his son — and that he kept funds meant to be reinvested in building projects while concealing the transactions.
Two points matter for business owners reading this. First, these are allegations. The Lovealls disputed the claims, appeared with their own counsel, and no court ever ruled on the merits. This is a lawsuit story, not a conviction story. Second — and this is the part that should make any co-owner uneasy — the suit alleges that when Crume’s side went looking for the financial records, they were effectively locked out: no clean access to the books, the accounting system, the IT, or the backups.
Why Loss of Access Is the Real Red Flag
In a 50/50 company, one side allegedly controlled the books, the bank, the software, and the backups — while the other owner couldn’t open his own company’s ledger. That is the original sin of most business partnership disputes. A 50/50 deal sounds fair until one person controls the checkbook. Then it isn’t 50/50 anymore; it’s one person driving and the other reading the crash report. Under most state LLC statutes, including the Missouri Limited Liability Company Act (Chapter 347), members have a statutory right to inspect company records — so blocking access can itself be actionable, independent of where the money went.
The Resolution: A Restraining Order in Three Days
Here’s where speed mattered. The suit was filed February 6. Three days later, on February 9, Judge Derek Ankrom granted a partial temporary restraining order. It did the two things that count when you suspect a partner is hiding the ball: it barred the defendants from altering or destroying company records, and it ordered financial information turned over.
That is leverage. You freeze the evidence before it can disappear and force the books into the light — in 72 hours. With that pressure applied, the case moved quickly toward the exit. After about a month of negotiation outside the courtroom, the parties agreed to dismiss, and in mid-April — roughly seven weeks after filing — the court signed off. The matter was resolved privately, with no trial and no public finding of liability. The plaintiffs’ attorney was permitted to say only that “the matter has been resolved.”
Most business partnership disputes end exactly this way: not with a jury, but with a private resolution driven by who holds the leverage. And leverage almost always comes from the documents signed on day one. For owners who do end up needing the courtroom, that work sits with our litigation team at Howard Law Group.
5 Clauses That Prevent Business Partnership Disputes
Every one of these is a paragraph you sign while everyone’s still friends and the money’s still small. Skip them, and you’re writing a future lawsuit with a logo.
1. The Control Map
Your operating agreement should spell out who can sign checks, move money, take loans, hire family, approve vendors, control payroll, and hold the passwords. “We trust each other” is not a governance structure — it’s a prayer with letterhead. The U.S. Small Business Administration recommends a written agreement defining authority and profit-sharing precisely because verbal understandings collapse under pressure.
2. Independent Financial Access for Both Owners
This is the clause that would have changed the story above. Both owners need direct, their-own-login access to the bank, the accounting system, and the backups — not a summary emailed quarterly. View-only access is cheap; litigation is expensive. The day you can’t see the money is the day you’ve already lost control of it.
3. Transaction Approval Thresholds
Separate ordinary spending from extraordinary spending in writing. Paying rent is ordinary. A large equipment purchase, a related-party payment, or a personal vehicle should require sign-off from both owners. Good operational controls — the kind business-consulting teams like Collateral Base help companies build into their SOPs — make self-dealing hard to hide and easy to catch early.
4. Fiduciary Duties With Teeth
Don’t just recite that members owe a duty of loyalty. Define what counts as self-dealing, require disclosure of related-party payments, and build in the right to emergency court relief plus a fee-shifting clause so a bad actor pays the legal bill if you have to go to court to see your own records. As the Cornell Legal Information Institute explains, fiduciary duty is enforceable — but only if your agreement and your evidence support the claim.
5. The Exit (Buy-Sell) Clause
Every 50/50 business needs a buy-sell, a deadlock-breaker, a valuation method, and an exit drafted before anyone is angry. Think of it as a fire exit, not a prenup: you don’t install it because you expect a fire, you install it because buildings sometimes catch fire. Partners who draft the divorce while they still like each other rarely end up in front of a judge.
Partnership Protection Checklist
| Protection | What It Does | Have It? |
|---|---|---|
| Written operating agreement | Defines authority, voting, and money rules | ☐ |
| Dual financial access | Both owners see the bank + books directly | ☐ |
| Spending approval thresholds | Flags extraordinary or related-party payments | ☐ |
| Defined fiduciary duties + remedies | Makes self-dealing actionable, shifts fees | ☐ |
| Books-and-records inspection right | Guarantees access; supports emergency relief | ☐ |
| Buy-sell / deadlock / valuation clause | A clean exit without a courtroom | ☐ |
Frequently Asked Questions
What causes most business partnership disputes?
Most business partnership disputes trace back to control and money: one owner controls the bank, books, and systems while the other loses visibility. A clear operating agreement with dual financial access and defined approval thresholds prevents the blindness that fuels these fights.
Can I sue a business partner for taking company money?
Potentially yes. Owners and managers owe fiduciary duties, and using company funds for personal expenses can be a breach if proven. You may also have books-and-records inspection rights and the ability to seek emergency relief to preserve evidence. Talk to a business attorney about your specific facts and state law.
How fast can a court act in a partnership dispute?
Faster than most owners expect. In the 7 Brew–related Missouri case, a court granted a partial temporary restraining order three days after filing, barring destruction of records and ordering financial documents turned over. Speed depends on having documentation and a clear story ready.
Why does a 50/50 ownership split cause problems?
A 50/50 split has no built-in tiebreaker, so a single disagreement can become a deadlock. Without a deadlock-breaker, buy-sell, and valuation method, owners can get stuck — which is why these clauses belong in the agreement from day one.
Next Steps
Business partnership disputes are almost always preventable with the right documents — and far cheaper to avoid than to litigate. If you’re forming a 50/50 company, taking on a partner, buying into a business, or already fighting about money, get the agreement reviewed before the next disagreement becomes a lawsuit.
Schedule a consultation with Howard East to turn a handshake deal into documents that survive contact with money. Learn more about our business-law practice or explore related guidance on the Howard East blog.
Attorney Advertising. This article is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. All matters described are allegations from court filings that were resolved privately with no admission or finding of liability. Outcomes depend on the specific facts and the law of your jurisdiction. Consult a licensed attorney in your state before making business decisions.
